|
The year 1471 should be remembered far more in English history than it is.
At that time the country had two kings fighting for the throne. Henry VI of the house of Lancaster, who had inherited the throne as an infant, and Edward IV of the house of York, who had usurped the throne and held Henry prisoner. They each had a son(both called Edward), who had an equal right to become the future king. This was because both houses had descended from the same king, (Edward III). The outcome of all this would be decided at a place called Hadley, to the North of London. When King Edward met Richard Neville, Earl of Warwick (who represented Henry) on the battlefield of Barnet on Easter Sunday 1471, it was not only the two houses that were fighting each other but two old friends who had shared much in life. Neville was the second richest man in England (only the king had more wealth) and with his riches he had helped Edward to depose Henry and take the throne. The Earl had been a great friend to Edward’s father,Richard Duke of York,and had aided him in his battles against the followers of the Lancastrian Red Rose until the Dukes death at The Battle of Wakefield in 1460. Warwick was soon advising the young Edward and they had a close relationship during the early years of his reign. But King Edward was his own man who had proved himself in battles and decisions at court and he became even more distant when he found a new queen. Her name was Elizabeth Woodville and she eventually turned her husband against his old friend.
|
Warwick was a shrewd and devious man,he once held two Kings of England in his power at the same time.
Henry VI and Edward IV both fell under his control in 1469) and he had another plan to make himself more powerful. Edward’s younger brother George, Duke of Clarence, was jealous of the king and in 1469 he married Warwick’s eldest daughter Isabel. The Duke now had a chance to be “The Kingmaker” if he could get Clarence onto the throne. With this in mind they raised an army against the king which ended in defeat. They both headed for what they saw as the safety of France. The king declared Warwick and Clarence traitors and once more Edward was in control of the country.
Of course The Duke of Clarence was none too pleased with Warwick’s plans, as he would lose his chance of the throne. Soon he would get his revenge. |
They landed a force in southern England and headed inland gathering more troops on the way. Edward was taken unawares as he and his forces were putting down a rebellion in the north. When he heard of Warwick’s return he headed for London. But at Doncaster he was told that a large part of his army led, by The Marquis of Montagu, (Warwick’s brother), had changed sides and would now be fighting against him. Trapped, and without enough men to win a battle, Edward, with his brother Richard Duke of Gloucester, decided it was better to run and fight another day.
They made for Bruges and his old friend Louis de la Gruthuse, the Governor of Holland. With Edward no longer in the country the land was in chaos. Order had to be restored. Warwick did this by putting Henry back on the throne, but at his coronation it was noticed that many of the Lords and knights present wore the bear and ragged staff badge of Warwick. Once the old king was dead the Earls daughter would be queen, and he would again be a leading figure at court. Although the Lancastrians had taken over London they had allowed Edward’s wife to keep the sanctuary of Westminster. Here in November 1470 she gave birth to a son, (Edward). Within six months, with the country having two kings and two heirs apparent , a conclusion would be reached on a common just outside Barnet. ![]() King Edward had wasted no time in building an invasion army during his absence and by early March 1471 he had enough men to set sail for his homeland and landed at the Humber on the 14th March. It did not take long for this news to reach Warwick and he began recruiting troops at Coventry ready for the battle that surely was to come. Meanwhile Edward headed for York, gathering men at arms on the way. From there he went to Coventry to confront Warwick and challenged him to a fight. This the Earl rejected, as he was waiting for The Duke of Clarence to arrive with reinforcements. Edward did not want to wait and marched away to meet his bother Clarence in Battle. Instead of fighting, however, the three brothers, Edward, Clarence and Richard forgot their differences and the York family was again united. With their large force they marched into London and Henry VI was returned to the tower. He did not know that he only had six weeks to live. Warwick waited within the walls of Coventry after Edward’s sudden departure until The Earl of Oxford, The Marquis Montagu and The Duke of Exeter had joined him. Then he was satisfied that their combined strength was enough to go into in battle. They followed Edward south with a large and well provisioned artillery train and on Good Friday April 12th 1471 Warwick’s Lancastrian army marched to St Albans and camped on the outskirts.
|
Barnet is set on a plateau and it was (and still is) one of the most important towns in southern England. At the time of Edwards trek up Barnet hill (there is a debate here which will be discussed later) there was possibly only about five or six inns in the town. The locals probably hoped that the Yorkists would be victorious. They did not want rampaging Lancastrians heading south leaving the town and the taverns at their mercy. Everything would have been stolen and the town would have been full of drunken soldiers with their minds on plundering and pillaging anything in their path. By marching his troops straight through the town without stopping perhaps means that he knew where he was going as he must have traveled this road many times in his journeys to the north. Any story of the battle will tell you that Edward’s line had his brother,18-year-old Richard, Duke of Gloucester’s men extended hundreds of yards too far to the East. He was unaware that there was no enemy to his front, just a muddy bog. It may be that he had to organise his troops once they had reached Barnet. If it was dark it would have been easy to set up the wrong line of attack in the pitch black. Also, if it was dark no one would make a light for fear of being seen by the other side. They might not have known they were in the wrong position. Take a walk up Barnet High Street today, and when you reach the edge of Hadley Common it is quite easy to imagine the area when it was flat, with no houses or buildings in the way. If you stand at the southern end of the common, where Edward drew up his forces, you cannot see the Hadley monument. WHO WAS ON THE LEFT AND WHO WAS ON THE RIGHT? But there is another version which states that Richard was on the left and Hastings was on the right. This is how they lined up in the next battle in the War of the Roses (Tewkesbury) so perhaps on that fateful day in Barnet they did the same. The only thing that could go against that is it means that Richard’s troops were going to get a beating that would affect the turn of the battle. And if it was Richard who was chased into Barnet how come he went back to the battle as he was seen with the king after the fighting was over. The great thing about the battle of Barnet is that there are many interpretations.
Every historian or writer of the battle can only surmise about what happened. But there is an account of what did occur that April day written nearer the time. This is the “Historie of the Arrivall of Edward IV in England and the Finall Recouerye of his Kingdomes” supposedly written by Nicholas Harpisfield, a Clerk who seems to have been present at the time. To get a real feel of what went on you have to visit the common to see that this could not have been like any ordinary battle where two sides faced each other in a field. But more of that later when we discuss the battlefield. |
EASTER SUNDAY 14th April 1471
Gladsmuir means “grey moor” in Old English and on that spring day the weather made it seem like that by covering the common with a thick mist.
Although Warwick and Montague had decided to fight on foot through the mire, the Earl of Oxford had favourable ground in front of him. He decided to stay on his horse with his heavy cavalry.
|
When Warwick received the news of Oxford’s success he must have felt he was on the verge of victory.
Warwick had chosen Exeter’s position as he never thought that anyone would attempt to attack through swampy ground, (remember he had had all the previous day to scout the area and decide his tactics). If you have read about the War of the Roses you will know that treachery played a big part at that time with noblemen changing sides and taking their armies with them. Oxford’s archers fired back thinking they were being attacked by the Yorkists. When they recognised each other there was utter confusion with both sides assuming they were being betrayed.
|
From here on the story of the Battle of Barnet becomes shrouded in theories, speculation and mystery. The main story regarding his death is that it is marked by the Hadley Highstone, situated at the junction of Kitts End and the Great North road. The obelisk was originally erected by Sir Jeremy Sambrook around 1740, to mark the spot where Warwick was killed. The stone was moved 200 yards north to its present location in 1840. 200 yards south would mean that the original site of the monument would be near the Hadley hall which would have been roughly the area where the horses could have been. A nobleman would have recognised Warwick from a distance, (the heavy fog would have lifted by then) and made sure that he got to his target before anyone else. What is fact is that his armour was stripped from his dead body and it appears that he died from a wound to the neck. Perhaps this was an execution by a knight who wanted vengeance or had something to gain. Perhaps Richard who gained Warwick’s land after his death at Barnet. There is no doubt Warwick met his end somewhere on the common that day at,or shortly after, the end of the battle. If he was fighting in the middle of the battle then up the present Great North road would have been his best escape route and the monument could be in the area. If he was still on the east after helping Exeter he might have had to go through some woods, in which case he never got near a horse.
News would have reached Edward of his former friend’s death which might have dampened the victory. On the Internet you can find about eight different maps which more or less agree about the battle site taken up by both armies. The key to where the battle took place is meant to be a hedge that runs through Old Ford golf club. It is said that Warwick hid his troops behind the hedge waiting for the king to make his appearance. |
History is a great subject as, unlike today where we can film events, we have to rely on writings of the time. These are often accounts written a few years after the event. The battle of Barnet did not have much written about it at the time. Perhaps because battles in the war of the roses came and went the importance of a particular battle is only realised years after it happened. This is why the Battle of Barnet is unique in the wars between the two roses. It did not last long, perhaps four or five hours, and it was not the bloodiest. But the list of casualties was like no other before or after it including the battle of Bosworth, mainly remembered because of the death of King Richard III. But we had Richard at Barnet when he was an 18 year old leading grown men into battle against the might of the Lancastrians and the battle hardened Warwick. This was not a battle where both sides could see each other. Fate, more than in any other battle, won the day. There are many variations of where Warwick and the Lancastrians set up camp on the eve of the battle.
Clearing the battlefield would have got underway quickly in view of the warm weather and most of the dead were probably buried within a week. The carnage on the field would have been a truly appalling sight. Estimates of the number killed vary greatly, as with most 15th Century battles, but it is likely to have been between 2,000 and 3,000.
10,000 arrows were apparently collected on the field afterwards and artillery would have been left where it was abandoned. Bodies with limbs hanging off and the sound of men screaming in pain would have filled the air in Barnet. Thousand of pints of blood flowed in the ponds and the fields of the small area that the main battle took place. Most of the tales of the Battle of Barnet state that the bodies were buried in a place called ” Deadman’s bottom” It has also been mentioned that Lancastrian solders ran into “Deadman’s” and were slaughtered. Some put the “the bottom” as being here on the Potters Bar road opposite Wrotham Park
|